The myth of passive social media users, and their war on absence
Passive? Who’s passive?
The internet cliché “You are the product” is wrong, argues the Atlantic: “We are neither products nor workers in surveillance capitalism’s quest for data. We are a passive source of raw material - a field to be harvested, or a mountain to be strip-mined.”
When I saw that article I immediately commented on Twitter that saying “passive source” is not <ALWAYS correct. As a minimum, we should always ask “passive source of what? About whom?”
Whenever WE tag people in posts or comments…
We are actively harvesting data for Facebook about those people. It is us who are telling Facebook that, for example:
- this friend of mine was at this conference yesterday
- this friend of mine likes Maldives, or this brand of shoes
- etc etc…
We provide that information to Facebook, even if that friend never shared it himself. The same applies to adding people names to pictures seen in Facebook:
Whenever WE identify people in Facebook pictures…
It is US who actively tell Facebook:
“THIS is what this guy (who maybe never posted a picture of his face himself) looks like, so now you can recognize him in other pictures too, and from there learn who he meets, where, why…”
(while we’re at this: did you ever stop to realize how RUDE it is, and why, to pass phone numbers to WhatsApp or Telegram?)
A data commons that is an absence
Reading those tweets of mine, @csageland replied:
“How can we protect a data commons that is an absence? A right to not be tagged, a collective respect for the solitude and agency of others.”
Good question, indeed. I am not sure that is a commons, but here are a few, semi-random thoughts to start thinking about to protect “absence”:
Sometimes, absence is absence of notifications about us, from the social network to others, e.g. the possibility to hide whether we are logged in or not.
Next, never forget that no technology can (thanks heaven) really fix, or improve, human behavior. Only education and human behavior can. In practice: keep your “sharing” of other people to the absolute possible minimum. Never tag others (including your own kids, who did not ask for it). This is a very partial fix, since even your mere sex, or list of contacts is enough to make you pay more for dating, or a mortgage.
Finally, the best way to “protect absence” still seems to me to not put everybody’s data in one and the same basket, where they can be correlated in countless addictive and toxic ways. This is why I’ve been saying for years that “the fix for Facebook is NOT a different PLATFORM”. Absence only exists when and where we were supposed to be together in the same place, after all.
In the meantime, until we’re stuck with “social media that are behavior collection businesses”, always show this to whoever says we are “passive” sources on social networks:
You may also:
- Follow my courses on Free Software, Digital Rights and more
- Read my free ebooks and other publications
- Support this and my other works
- Calicut: How and Why Open Hardware and Open Source can and should be used in non-western countries
- La Comunificadora is back with some new, challenging projects
- About Marco
- The myth of passive social media users, and their war on absence
- WHO can AFFORD not to fly in 2020? People or companies?
- Geopolitical take-away of the week, from UK, Italy and China
- Two surely unrelated primacies the USA can be proud of
- Four ways to take DNS services in your hand and WHY do it
- DNS glossary and tricks
- Save forests, not tigers or wolves
- What if that shooting guy had been a Thru...