The fix for Facebook is NOT a different PLATFORM
An article by Roger McNamee titled “How to Fix Facebook - Before it fixes us” does a great job of describing the problems created by Facebook or any other platforms working in the same way, but contradicts itself when it proposes certain kinds of regulatory fixes.
Those fixes are:
- ban digital bots that impersonate humans
- PLATFORMS should not be allowed to make any acquisitions until THEY demonstrate it wouldn’t cause harms
- PLATFORMS must be transparent about who is behind political and issues-based communication
- PLATFORMS must be more transparent about their algorithms
- PLATFORMS should be required to have a more equitable contractual relationship with users
- There must be limits on the commercial exploitation of consumer data by internet PLATFORMS.
- Consumers, not the PLATFORMS, should own their own data
- Time has come to revive the country’s traditional approach to monopoly
Consumers and (one) country?
Fixes n. 7 and 8 have two built-in limits. One is that any solution to sociopolitical problems that looks at “consumers” instead of “people” or “citizens” is, at best, very limited. At the same time, if we’re talking of platforms with billions members worldwide, any solution by any single country is, by definition, even more limited, and may cause more problems than it solves, in the long run. But the main point of this post is that…
Why fix something that you can (and should!) make irrelevant?
In his article, McNamee himself makes very well a crucial point:
“the internet has lost something very valuable. The early internet was designed to be decentralized. It treated all content and all content owners equally. That equality had value in society, as it kept the playing field level and encouraged new entrants. But decentralization had a cost: no one had an incentive to make internet tools easy to use.”
I agree 100%: decentralization is crucial here. For this very reason I find it contradictory that 7 of those 8 points are about fixing “platforms”. Platforms? We should be going where we do not need platforms, instead.
Insisting to applying correct fixes to the wrong kind of architecture solves very little, in the long run. ANY single platform that may still host millions would preserve the same problems you’re trying to fix. It would be, unavoidably, still be so centralized to make applying those fixes extremely complex, and full of unintended consequences. The only real fix to platforms like Facebook is to make it easier for people to communicate with each other DIRECTLY, without centralized platforms.
Don’t fix “PLATFORMS”. Create personal clouds, instead
The more time passes, the more I am convinced that this is the right approach. I’ve already explained it in detail in posts like:
- “Mastodon is a problem only if you WANT it to be a platform”
- “Forget Net Neutrality. Think personal clouds instead”
- and all my other Mastodon posts.
but in a nutshell, the proposal is:
- please somebody fund development and testing of SIMPLE, interoperable, really usable, really permanent personal clouds like I propose here
- please support their integration with “free as in freedom” smartphones like Eelo
- I’d REALLY like to work on it myself, but if others do it, it’s OK!
You may also:
- Follow my courses on Free Software, Digital Rights and more
- Read my free ebooks and other publications
- Support this and my other works
- Calicut: How and Why Open Hardware and Open Source can and should be used in non-western countries
- La Comunificadora is back with some new, challenging projects
- About Marco
- What if we just outlawed INSTANTNESS in social networks?
- Thoughts on energy (3 of 3): The political impacts of renewables or nuclear
- Geopolitical take-away of the week, from UK, Italy and China
- Two surely unrelated primacies the USA can be proud of
- Four ways to take DNS services in your hand and WHY do it
- DNS glossary and tricks
- Save forests, not tigers or wolves
- What if that shooting guy had been a Thru...