Another IoT declaration that misses the point

(Paywall-free popularization like this is what I do for a living. To support me, see the end of this post)

Sometimes, worrying about “trust” is unnecessary.

I have discovered only this week a post from 2018 announcing “A Trustmark for IoT: separating the Internet of Shit from the Internet of Things”.

Another IoT declaration that misses the point /img/trustabletech.jpg

That “Trustable Technology Mark” evaluates 5 dimensions that are essential to establish the trustworthiness of a connected device, namely:

  • Privacy & Data Practices
  • Transparency
  • Security
  • Stability
  • Openness

What is missing, or not given the right importance

None of those “dimensions” is wrong. If anything, they are obvious, meaning that every product from space shuttles to nail clippers, should give some level of guarantees on all those points. But the more guarantees (and watchdogs) there are, the better, so go Trustable Tech.

Still, that list may have been written differently. To begin with, “Openness”, as defined by Trustable Tech itself:

“How open are both the device and the manufacturer‘s processes? Is open data used or generated?"

should be in the first place, because if there is real openness in a product, most of those other guarantees are either already present, or are much easier to have.

The other thing I find missing, even if it does overlap only partially with the purpose of an organization about “trust”, is purpose. If a gadget is a useless gadget, as it is the case with so much consumer IoT products these days, how “trustable” it is has very little importance, or meaning.

Who writes this, why, and how to help

I am Marco Fioretti, tech writer and aspiring polymath doing human-digital research and popularization.
I do it because YOUR civil rights and the quality of YOUR life depend every year more on how software is used AROUND you.

To this end, I have already shared more than a million words on this blog, without any paywall or user tracking, and am sharing the next million through a newsletter, also without any paywall.

The more direct support I get, the more I can continue to inform for free parents, teachers, decision makers, and everybody else who should know more stuff like this. You can support me with paid subscriptions to my newsletter, donations via PayPal (mfioretti@nexaima.net) or LiberaPay, or in any of the other ways listed here.THANKS for your support!