Racially biased pulsimeters
More of the depressing same.
Proof of bias, mostly but not exclusively racial bias in “Big Data” and “Big Tech” keep coming.
After this and this, now it is the time of
Pulse oximeters, or pulsimeters, are these little devices here:
Pulsimeters measure the percentage of oxygen in blood, which is why they are lifesavers when a respiratory pandemic as COVID19 happens.
Problem is, the accuracy of readings by a pulsimeter depends on how accurately it takes into account the pigmentation of skin. When this doesn’t happen, you get this:
“Black patients were three times as likely to have a significant discrepancy in these readings."
“The findings aren’t entirely new, the team reports. A paper published in an anesthesia journal in 2005 also reported that skin pigmentation led to inaccuracy in pulse oximeter readings."
And, from here:
” in two large cohorts, Black patients had nearly three times the frequency of occult hypoxemia that was not detected by pulse oximetry as White patients."
More detail, including useful advice about using pulsimeters at home, is here.
Who writes this, why, and how to help
I am Marco Fioretti, tech writer and aspiring polymath doing human-digital research and popularization.
I do it because YOUR civil rights and the quality of YOUR life depend every year more on how software is used AROUND you.
To this end, I have already shared more than a million words on this blog, without any paywall or user tracking, and am sharing the next million through a newsletter, also without any paywall.
The more direct support I get, the more I can continue to inform for free parents, teachers, decision makers, and everybody else who should know more stuff like this. You can support me with paid subscriptions to my newsletter, donations via PayPal (mfioretti@nexaima.net) or LiberaPay, or in any of the other ways listed here.THANKS for your support!