Brexit means Brexit... and more high-tech pollution too
As a consequence of Brexit, the UK will also build its own GPS-equivalent satellite system. What does this really mean?
UK Prime Minister Theresa May rules out, it seems, the usage of EU’s Galileo project, because:
“[She] cannot let our armed services depend on a system we cannot be sure of - that would not be in our national interest”
In and by itself, this position makes 1000% sense. No question. The feasibility of that position is another issue altogether of course. Both costs, and physical limits, like lack of useable radio frequencies may tank it.
It would be nice to to know if it also applies to those F-35 fighters that, as far as I can tell, only Israel, not UK could “be sure of”, and service how and where it wants, with “full” control on which military data are sent abroad. But I may be wrong on that, and it is not the main point of this post anyway.
Here, however, I only want to point out another “drawback” of UK building its own GPS system: the huge, extra pollution, and maybe even non-negligible contribution to global warming that would be the unavoidable consequence of such a big, expensive, not really necessary duplication of equipment would bring.
You may also:
- Follow my courses on Free Software, Digital Rights and more
- Read my free ebooks and other publications
- Support this and my other works
- Calicut: How and Why Open Hardware and Open Source can and should be used in non-western countries
- La Comunificadora is back with some new, challenging projects
- About Marco
- On percloud, again
- The costs of percloud, vs anything else
- NextCloud 16 review
- Geopolitical take-away of the week, from UK, Italy and China
- Two surely unrelated primacies the USA can be proud of
- Four ways to take DNS services in your hand and WHY do it
- Save forests, not tigers or wolves
- What if that shooting guy had been a Thru...