The day the mobile phone took a wrong, dumb turn
A long time ago, we had really smart mobile phones: devices compatible with any pocket, that wouldn’t distract us every second, but get enough signal even inside a cave, last one week without recharging, and years without breaking. Then we got dumb phones that do all the opposite.
Some months ago a Kickstarter project tried to fix this sorry situation, by letting us recycle the dumb, bigger phones as protecting coasters for the really smart ones. That project is having some issues, but it doesn’t matter. The mere fact to see a real mobile phone, just “reloaded” in current technology, proposed as a “must-have accessory for a mobile lifestyle”, makes me think that we really let mobile phones took a wrong, dumb turn years ago. Imagine how things could be today, if we had:
- demanded that (as in “buy only…”) mobile phones do become every year smaller, lighter and with longer battery life, but remaining just mobile phones AND modems/WiFi hotspots
- bought tablets of whatever screen size and form factor, that are only capable to run apps and go online via WiFi to one’s mobile phone
- or, in other words: what if we had done with mobile computers the same thing we’ve done with _desktop /laptop ones? _What if we had kept also _mobile _hardware and software of the “applications” and “connectivity” parts physically separated, that is almost 100% interoperable no matter what brand of modem and PC you buy..
Had we done this, today we would have much more competition and real innovation in mobile computing, as well as much less planned obsolescenze, e-waste and lock-in, than the current “smart” phones give, or could ever give.
Buying a mobile computer, aka “smart” phone, bound to a phone contract is as dumb as buying a laptop or desktop computer bound to a phone contract.
Personally, I can’t wait to go “back” to the physical separation of phone/modem and computer, that would be real progress. It would be even much simpler than modular smartphones, which have serious limitations, _exactly _because they try to remain one single extra-compact object.
PS: don’t tell me you wouldn’t carry more than one device in your pockets or bag. You’re already carrying extra battery chargers, which in part are needed exactly because your current smartphone is one big power-sucking beast.
PPS: yes, some form of Instant Messaging app (but a real one, i.e. non proprietary, cross-platform Instant Messaging a-la-XMPP, not locked-to-one-phone-number crap like WhatsApp or Telegram) should be embedded in the “phone” object. But nothing else.
PPPS: I don’t really care if the physical separation happens by giving the phone/modem part the “smart” watch packaging that is so fashionable these days. As long as it is a true separation, meaning that that “watch” can work alone as a phone/modem and nothing else, and it can thus connect any separate “tablet” to the Internet
You may also:
- Follow my courses on Free Software, Digital Rights and more
- Read my free ebooks and other publications
- Support this and my other works
- Calicut: How and Why Open Hardware and Open Source can and should be used in non-western countries
- La Comunificadora is back with some new, challenging projects
- About Marco
- The myth of passive social media users, and their war on absence
- WHO can AFFORD not to fly in 2020? People or companies?
- Geopolitical take-away of the week, from UK, Italy and China
- Two surely unrelated primacies the USA can be proud of
- Four ways to take DNS services in your hand and WHY do it
- DNS glossary and tricks
- Save forests, not tigers or wolves
- What if that shooting guy had been a Thru...