The Online Loser Guide that I just wrote was born also as a reaction to a vision of the Internet (haven for perverted and terrorists, huge time-wasting toy or mere work tool) very limited and narrow-minded.
A proof that the effects of digital technologies are much deeper is in how they are influencing the religious sphere, in ways still largely ignored by traditional, mainstream media and by many blogs. The following paragraphs contain some evidence of this trend in Catholicism, but I'd guess that the same general concept is valid for any other religion (more on this at the end).
TV news shows do report, every now and then, about the Catholic Church and the Internet, but often it is very superficial coverage. All you get is announces and comments about project and activities which, while being without doubt welcome and really laudable, are nothing but extensions to a new media of stuff that was already happening before computers. The official Vatican page on YouTube, Internet streaming from Catholic TV or Radio stations like TeleRadio Padre Pio, software gadgets for Rosary on iPhone or Breviaries for the Android, or even spiritual advice on digital problems like "Is it a sin to dowload movies or buy pirated CDs?" have one thing in common: they use the existing digital technology, accepting without questions its more popular tools, to distribute the same informations and "services" of the pre-Internet era, in the same way, that is broadcasting from Church down to faithfuls.
While prime time TV coverage stops here, other things are happening in this field. Things at a different, more interesting level, if nothing else for its potential concrete effects in the medium and long term. The Vatican had already noted back in 2002 that "the technological configuration underlying the Internet has a considerable bearing on its ethical aspects" (Ethics in Internet). Later on other voices inside the Church started investigating if the official Church language in the field of Social Communications isn't too unidirectional, that is too tied to a vision in which "professionals" must instruct the faithfuls in the most effective way, rather than one of a world where communication has became a "many to many" phaenomenon (Fr. J. Fox, SDB, "Digital Virtues").
The fact that these are not isolated cases but signs of a more general trend would seem to be confirmed by more recent news. On June 3rd, 2009, Cardinal Hummes, Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, announced that they are evaluating the possibility to introduce specific courses on these themes for priests and seminarists, in order to remain conscious and effective witnesses of the Gospel even in this digital era. Even the theme chosen by Pope Benedict XVI for the 2010 World Day of Social Communications is "The priest and pastoral ministry in a digital world: new media at the service of the Word".
Initiatives like these, at those levels, may bring to closer and deeper dialogues and relationships between the Church and its faithfuls, that is to a scenario where, side by side to the "unidirectional communications", which certainly won't disappear, there will be Priests who, according to Card. Hummes, "surf side by side with other digital people in the great sea of communication". Such an evolution would be much deeper and relevant than any of the cases mentioned at the beginning. Another field of Catholic investigation that may bring to interesting results is the one about the nature of digital technologies: are they purely neutral tools? Can Catholics just adopt the most popular software tools and use them as most other people do, without thinking to how they really work, or should they pay more attention? It is questions like these who brought the author of this article to study Free Software’s surprising sympathy with Catholic doctrine, which in turn gave birth to Project Eleutheros, a Catholic approach to ICT.
None of these projects will produce any visible effect in the short term, but activities like these may have many more consequences for religious people than the simple distribution of religious content and news
also through the Internet. We'll see. In the meantime, here at the Stop! we'd like to know more about the impact of the Internet on other religions: if you have relevant links and information, please let us know!
Comments
Less Catholic, more Christian?
As to effects, is there some possibility ONE effect would be that people of faith would become MORE "people of faith" and LESS people of some BRAND of that faith (Catholic, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Pentecostal, etc.)?
There will still be polarization ... and it may increase ... but will the -poles- be different? Meaning will they, instead of institutions, be core _beliefs_?
**
However, I think the cautionary note of the following article is worthy of consideration in this context:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/31/the_out_of_control_decade/
**
Looking at the fall of the Soviet Union and the current revolt in Iran and adding to that the 6.5million Muslims turning to Isa (Jesus) annually - mostly in SECRET, the other issue may be SURVIVAL and GROWTH in a hostile environment.
Benefits?
Well, of course we know of all the online bible sites (seems I need to know MORE of them... I've seen url's on CARS around here!), but one site I found worthy is http://www.layman.org/Home.aspx. The latest one is: http://www.bibleuniverse.com/
Since I've been a member of/attending a Presbyterian church for over 20 years, I'm aware of the issues of the apostasy of the PCUSA and other mainline Protestant denominations (United Methodist, Episcopal, ELCA Lutheran - others??).
The Layman seems to be at the forefront of Reformed advocacy on the web. Naturally, they had been available in print for quite some time before they developed their web presence.
Another site I consider important is the following: http://www.messianictimes.com/
I'm presently recommending one related book: Israel's New Disciples by Julia Fisher, Google her name and you will eventually find the web site "Olive Tree Reconciliation Fund"
At the Messianic Times I found another intriguing site: http://www.oneforisrael.org/
As you can see, I'm very much in support of Jewish evangelism ... I've been a supporter of Jews for Jesus since the early 70's when I heard Moishe Rosen speak at the Conservative Baptist church I was then attending.
If you're interested in Muslims coming to Isa, from a NON-Muslim perspective I'd recommend Secret Believers by Brother Andrew. I have a long-standing relationship with the mission he started in the late 50's-early 60's: Open Doors.
The international headquarters are in Holland.
The U.S. web site is http://www.opendoorsusa.org
Paul
P.S. you're invited to http://www.varlinux.org ... I've always felt we could benefit from an international perspective, but I realize there are a few barriers - language and culture being likely the most significant. If you can put up with US, you're WELCOME!
Paul, thanks for the links.
Paul,
thanks for the links. However, what I'm mostly interested in (just because of lack of time, must set some priorities somehow) is not, at least now, online presence, that is if and how much the official text and communications from the top of some religion are reachable and distributed online.
The thing I'm looking after is symptoms of online communication changing the whole interaction between "priest" (hyerarchies) and "faithfuls". I'm using Christian/Catholics specific terms here which may not be proper or applicable to other religions because they're the only ones I know well, but I'm sure all readers will understand what I mean.
Online effects
Well, from what little I've seen, I wonder how much it HAS changed/affected communication.
The problem with a FAITH relationship, I think, is that if REAL faith is involved, it is far more likely to require face to face interaction.
Yes, we can blog. We can send email. We can pray for someone we've never seen. But, although the MEDIUM has changed, it really HASN'T.
Because what has actually changed is the MEANS. The medium, language, remains the same.
If we think deeply, we will communicate more substantially, by whatever means we apply. Many seem not to relate to _written_ communications, so where does that leave the electronic means?
Now, ONE difference is accessibility. If it weren't for the Internet, would I be carrying on a conversation with someone in Italy (or India or..)???
My most significant present CONCERN is unity among those who follow Jesus, Y'shua, Isa. The Internet can bring people together in ways nothing else can.
However, I don't know that I'm seeing this happen that much in reality ... yet.
My interests tend to be very broad ... that curiosity again. ...but I'll stop here lest I seem to extend this too far beyond your original question!