What may make Warren's "break up Facebook" proposal USELESS
Everybody has been saying for a while that “it’s time to break up Amazon, Google and Facebook”, and now even a USA 2020 presidential candidate has joined that team. Is her proposal complete?
Amazon is probably a different story, but with companies like Google or Facebook… in general, breaking them up is half impossible, half useless, as I have already said several times. At first sight, even this new proposal seems to fall into that category.
On March 8th, 2019, Elizabeth Warren published a proposal to break up Amazon, Google and Facebook which includes regulation to “reverse illegal and anti-competitive tech mergers”, like Facebook with WhatsApp and Instagram, because “unwinding these mergers will promote healthy competition in the market”. The assumption is that such regulation would:
- put on Facebook “real pressure from Instagram and WhatsApp to improve the user experience and protect our privacy”
- give new tech entrepreneurs “a fighting chance to compete against the tech giants”
The truth is that communication services are not like biscuit makers. You and your relatives don’t need to eat the same biscuits to have breakfast together. In and by itself, instead, reversing the Facebook/WhatsApp/Instagram mergers would merely keep everybody stuck into the same, unbelievably stupid situation we have been for years now:
unable to directly, transparently exchange messages between Facebook, WhatsApp and any other instant messaging provider, which is as smart as, for example, Huawei phones unable to call iPhones, or Vodafone users unable to call Verizon ones.
Breaking up communication providers is completely useless, if they are allowed to be incompatible with each other.
The only thing that will “put real pressure” on certain companies in the right way is forcing them to use, and make really accessible to all their users, really open protocols to communicate transparently with the users of any other competing service of the same type.
Lack of such interoperability may not be the only thing that should become illegal, but surely is the first one. Only forcing Facebook, with or without Instagram and WhatsApp inside, to be really interoperable with every other provider of the same services gives:
- to its two billions users, real, actual freedom to transparently communicate with all the users of e.g. Telegram, or to switch to any other provider of instant messaging
- to any current or future competitor, an actually fair playing field
Do that, and anti-merger regulation will be much less needed. But please don’t waste any more time to break up, nationalize or transform into a cooperative anything like Facebook in that way:
- turn it into a mimeograph instead
- and impose real interoperability and “interface freedom”, as I explain here
- and again: enough of proposals to regulate, break or clone Facebook, Google & C.
- oh, and last but not least: please support realistic personal clouds like this, whoever makes them.
Picture source: Gizmodo, “The Movement to Break Up Facebook Has Begun” (break up in the wrong way, of course)
You may also:
- Follow my courses on Free Software, Digital Rights and more
- Read my free ebooks and other publications
- Support this and my other works
- Calicut: How and Why Open Hardware and Open Source can and should be used in non-western countries
- La Comunificadora is back with some new, challenging projects
- About Marco
- The myth of passive social media users, and their war on absence
- WHO can AFFORD not to fly in 2020? People or companies?
- Geopolitical take-away of the week, from UK, Italy and China
- Two surely unrelated primacies the USA can be proud of
- Four ways to take DNS services in your hand and WHY do it
- DNS glossary and tricks
- Save forests, not tigers or wolves
- What if that shooting guy had been a Thru...