The problem with AI? Sometimes is humans. Human PARENTS, that is
Here is some food for thought on the consequences of handling smartphones, social networks and profiling algorithms to parents who, in 99.9999% of cases, are thoroughly unable to handle them.
The topic? The parenting hell, I mean bliss, coming from the possibility to find the perfect babysitter thanks to artificial intelligence scans for respect and attitude. We already have moms snitching on nannies who dare to check phones while at the playground. What happens when the same attitude is automatically enforced before even meeting the potential babysitter in person? Here are some questions, mostly from the above mentioned Twitter thread:
Let’s go find the right babysitter for you, Tommy
Parents don’t get fired if they lose it for a second or decompress in ways the algorithm would disapprove of. Babysitters need it just as much or more. Denying that is literally inhuman.
How long until these parents demand that nannies install malware on their phones to track their movements, usage, or record them?
What exactly is the lesson that a kid is supposed to take away from her parents subjecting the sitter to this indignity? The same one they always learn from parents like this: the people in your employee are less than human and don’t deserve rights like “privacy.”
Oh, and of course: how about giving the babysitters an option of demanding the reverse? Why not subject parents too to the same checks?
And the more important question is…
In some extreme cases, babysitters declared 100% perfect by highly invasive, malicious algorithmic interrogations of their entire social life may just be, for the same reasons, serial-killer material. In all the others, any decent adult knows that kids have an uncanny ability to detect fakes and poses. When that happens, kids tend to take home from those “models” all kinds of lessons and conclusions, except the ones their parents would like, which brings us to the next question:
The people who can get (or cheat…) the highest scores from certain interrogations may often be, almost by definition, not the most authentic, mature, well-balanced human role models. Which sane parent would leave their kids with such “champions”?
All in all, this babysitters-by-AI madness really is just another example of the huge contradiction of these times: algorithms that “prod you to be the worst/fake you can be” and then, when it is hiring time, reject you for what they have stimulated you to become.
You may also:
- Follow my courses on Free Software, Digital Rights and more
- Read my free ebooks and other publications
- Support this and my other works
- Calicut: How and Why Open Hardware and Open Source can and should be used in non-western countries
- La Comunificadora is back with some new, challenging projects
- About Marco
- The problem with AI? Sometimes is humans. Human PARENTS, that is
- What may make Warren's "break up Facebook" proposal USELESS
- Two surely unrelated primacies the USA can be proud of
- First World Luxury Problems
- Four ways to take DNS services in your hand and WHY do it
- DNS glossary and tricks
- Save forests, not tigers or wolves
- What if that shooting guy had been a Thru...